One of the important mistakes is refraining from critical review of the manuscript as a whole after completion of the writing process. It is appropriate to review the manuscript for the third time 1 or 2 weeks after completion of its writing process.
One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. Give a brief explanation about why you believe the findings and conclusions of your study are important and how they support broader knowledge or understanding of the research problem.
Before writing down the manuscript, determination of 2—3 titles increases the motivation of the authors towards the manuscript. One easy way to avoid this confusion is to think of your conclusion as a summary of everything that you have said thus far.
Bates College; Hess, Dean R. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases.
The reason for this is that during writing process of the main text, the significant study outcomes might become insignificant or vice versa. This approach is not recommended if you lack experience writing college-level research papers.
If more than one unexpected finding emerged during the study, describe each of them in the order they appeared as you gathered or analyzed the data. Explain the Meaning of the Findings and Why They are Important Consider the likelihood that no one has thought as long and hard about your study as you have.