The different views on the authenticity of tourism
The most prominent authors who set the grounds of a more than a century long debate are Kierkegaard, Heidegger and Sartre. A high level of expectation my hamper the direct processing of the ImpCal intake in the sense that the tourist does not value the waterfall as a phenomenon on its own, but it is measured according to the expectation the tourist had.
Authenticity in tourism essay
Oxford: Oxford UP, p. We could then speak of authenticity of tourism communication, which has to do with the proper conveyance of the message from the receiving community to the tourists visiting the destination. Most main and side Impsources are being visited on the basis of material images and expectations, but for shared and incidental Impsources things are different. A completely different story is the case of shared and incidental Impsources. This type of traveller may be open to enjoying cultural and historical local life, but he differs from tourists in that he has little material or mental expectation patterns and hardly knows what to expect therefore. How well a tourist can observe ImpCal intake , how expectations patterns are set and to what extent a tourist tries to smell new flavours or eat different dishes depend on each tourist individually. The sense of wonder about different places and ways of life seems to me to be the essential emotion of travel. Of course, it's a personal thing, but whatever you feel reveals the sense of a place or culture is probably the most authentic. This could mean simple, rural or natural experiences, like those offered by travel schemes such as Workaway or World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms. Whether the experience will really touch the inner-person or how deeply rooted the resulting experience will be remains doubtful. Obviously, reality is quite different and never forget that authenticity is something seen through the eyes of humans, while things and phenomenon simply are as they are with or without authenticity. Thus, the same object could have different authenticity, depending on the person and his or her beliefs, knowledge etc. Any tourism travel can be viewed as a communication event and its examination should include all participants — the local people, local, regional and state authorities, providers of tourism services, specialists in heritage, and, of course — tourists. It's tempting to say who cares if a few tourists are conned?
Engler lists the following possible reasons for this seemingly contradictory phenomenon: moral energy the duty to truth dictated by Christian concept of guilt ; class affiliation staged experiences are defamed as kitsch by the higher social class ; tourism marketing a consequence of the previous two.
One more possible perspective, which encompasses everything mentioned so far, is that of the way the tourism product is communicated.
For this reason many have argued that local people - rather than the tourism industry or marketers - should be the custodians of what is 'traditional.
The concept of authenticity in tourist experiences
Mental images play a much bigger part with tourists when they travel individually or in small groups through a country than in the case of big groups or resort tourism. Opinions on the first issue significantly vary from total rejection of the importance of authenticity as a motif for travel to defining it as the major push factor. That is called tourism. Since then, two main dimensions have been discussed — its strength and role as a motivator for travel, and its manifestation in tourism activities. Do 'original and traditional' really help us understand what is authentic? Posted in: Authenticity on October 14, All rights reserved. At a simple level it makes sense that if you treat local people right they will be more likely to share their world with you. A high level of expectation my hamper the direct processing of the ImpCal intake in the sense that the tourist does not value the waterfall as a phenomenon on its own, but it is measured according to the expectation the tourist had. A striking contradiction between theory and practice is seen with regard to the nature of authenticity. The Tourist Gaze. Why not try one of our - dare I say it authentic - holidays yourself?
How authentic is this? The sense of wonder about different places and ways of life seems to me to be the essential emotion of travel. Nevertheless, if tourists still feel they have some sort of authentic experience, we may call this dressing up symbol related authenticity. What can we learn from this in tourism?
The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics.
Things that were original and real in a certain area were tied for place, depending on the geological and geographical characteristics of the region. Studying the possible referents of authenticity in tourism, the following opposing pairs were identified: 1 Authenticity — fakery heritage sites and artifacts, art ; 2 Authenticity — commoditization traditions, crafts, art ; 3 Authenticity — insincerity local community 4 Authenticity — disempowerment local community 5 Authenticity — passiveness tourists 6 Authenticity — uncreativity tourists 7 Authenticity — communication breakdown holistic approach The last dimension, focused on authenticity of the whole process of interactions between guests and hosts is arguably the least studied.
The most common opinion from those I've spoken to in the industry seems to be that authentic is what you feel is authentic. However, we think there is a very strong relationship between acting in a caring and responsible way and being given the opportunity for authentic experiences.
In historic towns this is manifested by individual original objects.
based on 90 review